![medialink mwn wapr300n firmware medialink mwn wapr300n firmware](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/fcEAAOSwOfFeqdmx/s-l640.jpg)
Secondly, Mediabridge made much of claiming that TD’s accusation that the Mediabridge product was identical to the Tenda was false. They touted that they never sued TD – true, but that is almost a distinction without a difference given that their demand letter wrote of “coming litigation,” which could only be avoided by the utter capitulation by TD to Media bridge by agreeing deleting his review, and to never buy or comment about any Mediabridge product, ever. Media bridge defended its actions in a way that appears to me to be deliberately misleading based on their narrow slicing of terms. Instead, they went for a thuggish, censorious legal smackdown. Had Mediabridge merely responded, as they have done to many reviews in the comments section, with the real reasons why they have so many positive reviews and with the real facts of how the Mediabridge routers are electrically identical to Tenda routers, but modified with improvements to the firmware and memory then they would have looked good. It was the Goliath on steroids legal demand letter that outraged people, causing them to take up figurative arms against the aggressor.
![medialink mwn wapr300n firmware medialink mwn wapr300n firmware](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/uyAAAOSwadhe6u6H/s-l400.jpg)
Not that Mediabridge challenged the validity of TD’s claims. Not that media bridge thought TD was wrong. The real take away from this situation should be that Mediabridge responded with a hugely disproportionate legal threat with what seem like utterly unconscionable demands under threat of imminent legal action. Frankly, most products only have a modicum of reviews, so it isn’t surprising that TD found it jarring that that a fairly generic router had way more reviews than products that are much more well known, and not only that but had something like 1,500 (IIRC) 5 star reviews. And it was merely one review, a counter to the hundreds and hundreds of 5 star reviews. TD wrote a single review that appears to have been substantially true. The problem, I think, is that this isn’t a balanced situation. ReplyĪ good article which tries to be fair and balanced. I will sit in the shade and watch while my subwoofer thumps away. I am quite satisfied with the quality and price of the Mediabridge product I received and will continue to do business with them until I am convinced otherwise. From TekRevue’s article I don’t think “TD” had proper evidence to support his allegations. My gut tells me Mediabridge may have been a bit overzealous in dealing with “TD” but legally and ethically correct in their position.
#Medialink mwn wapr300n firmware free#
As an Amazon Prime member I would receive free 2 day shipping but Mediabridge offers free “standard” shipping on orders of $15 or more. I was also looking at the Mediabridge 8 outlet surge protector SKU: IS8-251listed at $29.99 on the Mediabridge site but costing $39.99 on Amazon. This item lists at $19.99 on both companies’ websites. This item was listed as “Sold by Mediabridge Products, LLC and Fulfilled by Amazon in easy-to-open packaging”. What I can say is I ordered a Mediabridge subwoofer cable from Amazon on 8 July 2014 and received it today 11 July 2014 so Amazon is still listing Mediabridge products for sale. It is very difficult to know who to believe on either side of this situation.